A 90-day EA study plan for your next part
Use these 90 days to prepare for one SEE part: nine weeks of coverage and practice, three weeks of mocks and repair, then six buffer days. Follow the column for your chosen part. The example budgets 10 hours a week for 12 weeks, or 120 hours before the buffer. It is an adaptable study plan, not a promise to pass all three parts in three months.
- Scope
- 1 selected partChoose the matching topic column.
- Example budget
- 120 hours12 weeks × 10 hours; buffer extra.
- Final buffer
- Days 85-90Light review and appointment preparation.
Your 90-day plan at a glance
| Days | Main work | Evidence to collect |
|---|---|---|
| 1-63 | Learn every domain; answer questions each week. | A coverage checklist and an error log. |
| 64-84 | Complete two full mocks and repair recurring mistakes. | Fresh timed answers and explanations. |
| 85-90 | Keep recall active; confirm exam logistics. | Ready ID, route or remote setup, and appointment. |
Every week, for your selected part
Use one topic column. Each full week has an illustrative 10-hour budget. The six buffer days have no fixed hour quota.
| Week / days | Weekly focus | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 · days 1-7 | Diagnose and map | Filing status and taxpayer data | Entity types and return obligations | Practice eligibility and professional duties |
| 2 · days 8-14 | Learn + retrieve | Income sources and exclusions | Partnership formation and basis | Circular 230 duties and sanctions |
| 3 · days 15-21 | Learn + apply | Asset sales and basis | Corporations and shareholder transactions | Authorizations and representation scope |
| 4 · days 22-28 | Mixed checkpoint | Retirement income and investments | S corporations and distributions | Taxpayer records and legal authority |
| 5 · days 29-35 | Learn + retrieve | Deductions and limitations | Business income and expenses | Examination and appeals procedures |
| 6 · days 36-42 | Learn + apply | Credits and eligibility facts | Accounting methods and records | Collection procedures and alternatives |
| 7 · days 43-49 | Timed sections | Tax computation and other taxes | Asset basis and dispositions | Penalties and relief procedures |
| 8 · days 50-56 | Coverage checkpoint | Tax planning and payments | Specialized returns and taxpayers | Filing, e-file and preparer duties |
| 9 · days 57-63 | Finish + reconnect | Estates, gifts and international reporting | Retirement plans, farms and exempt entities | Combine ethics with representation cases |
| 10 · days 64-70 | Full mock + repair | A mixed 100-question Part 1 mock | A mixed 100-question Part 2 mock | A mixed 100-question Part 3 mock |
| 11 · days 71-77 | Retest weak rules | New stems on recurring errors | New entity and transaction combinations | New duty, deadline and authority cases |
| 12 · days 78-84 | Mock + final review | Second mock; check timing and explanations | Second mock; check entity selection | Second mock; check procedure selection |
| Buffer · days 85-90 | Light review + logistics | Recall the rules you repaired | Recall entity distinctions | Recall duties and procedures |
Swipe the calendar to compare the three part columns.
Before day one: choose the part and define what completion means
Pick one of the three calendar columns and copy its topic sequence into your own schedule. A week marked “complete” should mean more than finishing a video. Attach an output to each topic: explain a rule without notes, solve a changed example and record the reason for a missed answer. The calendar gives structure; those outputs tell you whether the work is transferring.
Reserve the actual study blocks before choosing an appointment. Ten hours that exist only as a weekly aspiration are easy to lose. List the evenings or weekend periods you can protect, then account for travel, busy work weeks and other commitments. If your available time is closer to five hours, use the slower scenario below rather than silently removing review from the same calendar.
Check the current outline and tax-law cutoff for the intended sitting. This plan can be reused in 2027 and later, but topic details and year-sensitive rules must follow the bulletin for that cycle. An evergreen schedule does not make an old deduction threshold current.
What a 10-hour study week looks like
Protect the review time before adding more questions. A busy week with fewer well-reviewed items is more informative than a high question count with no explanation of errors. The allocation below is editorial and should change with your starting knowledge.
| Block | Hours | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Two learning blocks | 4 | Notes that state the rule and the conditions. |
| Two question blocks | 3 | Closed-note attempts with confidence marked. |
| One review block | 2 | Corrected explanations for mistakes and guesses. |
| One retest block | 1 | Fresh questions on last week’s missed rules. |
A complete 10-hour week: Part 3 duties and Circular 230
Here is an illustrative version of week two for someone studying Part 3. The topic comes from the calendar, but the study blocks are an editorial example. Replace the days to fit your work pattern while preserving the sequence of instruction, practice, review and a later retest.
The important handoff is between Thursday and Saturday. Saturday’s review uses the errors from Thursday to decide what to repair. Sunday then uses changed facts, so remembering the old answer is not enough. If you cannot explain why an alternative is wrong, keep that rule on the next week’s review list.
| Day | Hours | Work | Visible output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monday | 2 | Learn competence and conflict conditions. | A short rule map with every condition. |
| Tuesday | 1.5 | Attempt unfamiliar questions without notes. | Answers marked correct, missed or guessed. |
| Wednesday | 2 | Learn client-record and written-advice duties. | One changed-fact example for each duty. |
| Thursday | 1.5 | Mix the four duties in new cases. | An error log identifying the missed condition. |
| Friday | 0 | Protected rest or existing work commitment. | No assumed catch-up quota. |
| Saturday | 2 | Review the errors and rebuild weak explanations. | Corrected reasoning in your own words. |
| Sunday | 1 | Retest the repaired rules with different facts. | A short list of remaining gaps for next week. |
| Total | 10 | Four learning hours, three practice hours, two review hours and one retest hour. | Evidence of learning as well as time spent. |
Original worked example
You answered a conflict question correctly but guessed between two options. Should it disappear from the review list?
No. Mark it for explanation and a changed-fact retest.
The correct selection did not establish that you understood the condition. Review uncertainty alongside incorrect answers so the next block addresses the actual gap.
Make each checkpoint a decision
At the end of week 4, identify topics that you cannot explain without looking. At week 8, check whether any outline domains remain untouched. Use weeks 10 and 12 to test the full format, including section submission.
Do not use a single percentage as an automatic booking rule. Repeated questions, uneven topic coverage and guessed answers can all make a score look stronger than the underlying skill.
Original worked example
You have completed only half the outline by day 56. Should you double the question count and keep the appointment?
Rebudget the remaining coverage and review first. Extend the plan if your available hours cannot cover both.
More questions do not create the missing hours. A manageable plan keeps coverage, explanation review and timed practice together.
Recover a missed week without hiding the backlog
After an interruption, list unfinished topics and estimate the remaining work in study blocks. Separate learning time from explanation review and timed rehearsal. Moving every unfinished item into the six buffer days can produce a calendar that looks complete while leaving no time to check whether the learning worked.
Suppose you estimate 18 hours of remaining instruction, eight hours of question review and eight hours for a mock plus its review. That is 34 hours. If only three 10-hour weeks remain, the plan is short by four hours before any additional buffer. You must find realistic time, reduce genuinely redundant work or move the appointment; rewriting the same workload into smaller boxes does not solve the shortage.
Keep at least one representative task from every domain when prioritizing. A narrow weak area deserves extra attention, but dropping untouched domains entirely exchanges a visible weakness for a hidden one. Recheck the plan after the next retest rather than assuming a single catch-up weekend repaired everything.
| Problem | Adjustment | Evidence that it helped |
|---|---|---|
| One evening lost | Move one block into an available slot or the buffer. | The planned output is completed without deleting review. |
| One full week lost | Recalculate remaining hours and appointment feasibility. | The remaining workload fits actual calendar space. |
| Scores improve only on repeated items | Replace some repetition with unfamiliar stems. | The rule transfers when names, amounts or conditions change. |
| Untimed work is sound but mocks run long | Practice section budgets and submission decisions. | A complete section finishes with time to review. |
Adapt for fewer hours or several parts
At five hours a week, the example 120-hour workload takes about 24 weeks. At 15 hours, it takes about eight weeks before buffer time. These are arithmetic scenarios, not research estimates of how long EA preparation takes.
To attempt all three parts within 90 days, first diagnose all three and build separate hour budgets. Do not compress three full beginner plans into one by deleting review. Tax experience may help some topics while leaving representation procedures or entity rules unfamiliar.
| Situation | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| New to taxation | Spend more time on foundations; use the first 90 days for one part. |
| Experienced individual-return preparer | Diagnose Part 1 before shortening it; preserve time for unfamiliar special returns. |
| Missed a week | Use the buffer for a small interruption; replan larger gaps. |
| Retaking one part | Use the diagnostic report to prioritize repair without dropping full-outline coverage. |
Use days 85-90 as a buffer and a controlled finish
The final six days are not six additional full learning days built into the 120-hour example. Use them for small unfinished tasks, short recall and appointment preparation. A large syllabus gap at this point calls for replanning, not an overnight attempt to replace several weeks of instruction.
If day 90 is your appointment, the example below keeps the preceding days light. If your sitting is later, preserve the same order relative to the appointment rather than forcing a test date to match an arbitrary calendar number.
| Day | Priority |
|---|---|
| 85 | Review the mock error log and select the most persistent gaps. |
| 86 | Retest those rules with changed facts and short explanations. |
| 87 | Check the full coverage map for any untouched topic. |
| 88 | Confirm the appointment, identity documents and travel or remote setup. |
| 89 | Use brief familiar recall, then leave time for rest. |
| 90 | Follow the exam-day checklist if testing; otherwise continue light retrieval until the appointment. |
Common questions
- Does this plan cover all three parts in 90 days?
- No. It provides a complete 90-day plan for one chosen part, with parallel topic columns for Parts 1, 2 and 3.
- Is 120 hours an official requirement?
- No. It is the arithmetic budget of this example. Prior knowledge and actual performance determine whether you need more or less time.
- When should I use the free PDF?
- Use it early to inspect explanations and discover weak rules. Its 20 questions are selected practice, so use a full 100-question mock separately for timing.
Sources and editorial notes
By MiloPrep editorial team. References checked 11 October 2026. Official references support the exam and administrative facts. Worked examples, schedules and study advice are original editorial material, not official SEE questions or guaranteed passing standards.
MiloPrep is an independent study resource, not affiliated with or endorsed by the IRS, PSI or the named course providers. Their names and marks belong to their owners.