Skip to main content
EA Part 3 study guide

EA Part 3 practices and procedures: domain study map

Practices and Procedures is a Part 3 domain with 26 of the 85 scored questions. It covers who may practice, practitioner duties, ethical standards, enrollment responsibilities and penalties. Learn the rule families and then work the narrower scenarios; 26 is a domain allocation, not an individual lesson’s weight.

Organize the domain by the decision being tested
Organize the domain by the decision being tested
Rule familyStudy questionDistinction
Practice statusWho may act and what privileges apply?Confusing a PTIN with unlimited representation rights.
Client dutiesWhat must the practitioner do when an error or request appears?Ignoring records or known errors.
Conduct standardsIs the position, advice or engagement permissible?Treating a client waiver as a cure for everything.
ConsequencesWhich disciplinary or preparer-penalty rule applies?Mixing OPR sanctions with taxpayer penalties.

Swipe the table to compare all columns.

Use one fact pattern to test different duties

A client’s questionable credit claim can raise both the general diligence duty and specific paid-preparer due diligence. A fee dispute can raise records obligations. Identify the source of each obligation separately; a correct answer about one rule does not necessarily satisfy the other.

Organize this domain around the practitioner’s decisions

Practices and Procedures is the Part 3 domain concerned with who may practice and how practitioners must conduct their work. Its 26 scored questions are a domain allocation, not a promise that a particular rule receives a fixed number of questions. Build a map of authority, enrollment obligations, duties, prohibited conduct and possible sanctions. Memorizing a list of section numbers without connecting them to decisions leaves the central task unfinished.

For each topic, record the triggering fact, the required or prohibited act and the limit on the rule. A known omission triggers prompt advice; a conflicting engagement requires a permissibility assessment; an unfamiliar matter requires appropriate competence. This organization also helps separate the domain from case preparation and specific examination or collection remedies, which receive their own lessons.

Distinguish professional status from engagement authority

The right to practice as an EA depends on enrollment status and the applicable practice rules. Continuing education and renewal keep that status current; passing an examination part alone does not grant it. Circular 230 also recognizes other categories and limited practice situations. Do not conclude that every return preparer has the same representation rights as an enrolled agent.

Once professional eligibility is established, a separate question remains: what has this taxpayer authorized? A practitioner may be eligible to represent taxpayers generally but lack authority for a particular entity, matter or period. This domain introduces the distinction. The power-of-attorney lesson develops Form 2848 and Form 8821 mechanics, so a study answer should first identify whether the problem concerns the person’s status or the client’s authorization.

Use four duty families to connect the narrower lessons

Accuracy duties concern what the practitioner knows, what needs inquiry and what may be stated in a return or advice. Relationship duties concern conflicts and the conditions for serving affected clients. Information duties concern responding to proper requests and handling records. Professional-capacity duties concern competence and the conduct of practice. These families overlap, but naming the main trigger helps locate the governing rule.

For example, a request to respond to an IRS letter may initially be an authority problem. Once authorized, inconsistent documents create an accuracy problem. If two represented owners then take adverse positions, a conflict problem appears. The correct response evolves with the facts. Use the specialist lessons for the precise conditions and clocks rather than trying to force all of them into one universal ethics checklist.

Where to deepen each rule*
Where to deepen each rule
Duty familyQuestion to answerLesson to revisit
AccuracyWhat contradiction or known error changes the next action?Circular 230 duties; preparer due diligence.
Client relationshipsCan each client be represented competently and diligently?Conflict of interest.
Information and recordsWhat must be supplied, returned or retained?Recordkeeping requirements.
Professional capacityWhat expertise and preparation does the matter require?Circular 230 duties; mixed ethics scenarios.

Swipe the table to compare all columns.

Check the consequence only after identifying the duty

A taxpayer penalty, a paid-preparer penalty and an OPR disciplinary sanction concern different actors and authorities. One event can raise more than one issue, but an answer about a taxpayer’s interest charge is not a substitute for the practitioner’s duty to inquire. Start a sanctions question by identifying who is being evaluated and the conduct alleged. Then use the relevant legal standard instead of assuming that every error causes disbarment.

To review this domain, take a mixed scenario and write four short entries: status, duty, permitted next action and possible consequence. Leave an entry marked "not established" when the facts do not support it. This prevents guessing an intention or penalty that the question has not supplied. Read the narrower rule lesson when the missing piece is a legal condition, and use a new scenario to check that you can apply it independently.

Original worked example

A valid PTIN is not the entire qualification

A person has a PTIN and prepares returns, then claims that the PTIN alone grants the same IRS representation rights as an enrolled agent.

  1. 1Separate preparer identification from practice status.
  2. 2Identify the person’s actual eligibility category.
  3. 3Check whether the matter falls within that category’s permitted practice.

The PTIN alone does not establish the EA’s broad representation privileges.

Questions about this topic

Is this domain only about ethics?

No. The official outline also covers enrollment requirements, fees, records, return-preparer responsibilities and penalties.

Sources and editorial notes

Prepared by MiloPrep editorial team. The linked provisions support the rules; examples and study methods are editorial teaching material. This page does not claim review by an enrolled agent.

For the 2026 SEE cycle, the IRS specifies law through 31 December 2025 and generally calendar year 2025. Procedural sources can be revised; use the active bulletin and the exact notice or form instructions for the applicable period.

Notes

  • * Where to deepen each rule: Editorial study map, not additional official domain weights. ↩ Return to content