CFA Level 3 Private Markets pathway due diligence
Private-markets due diligence tests the investment thesis, manager capability, cash-flow assumptions, legal terms and ability to exit. Read the fund-level commitments and fees separately from the operating performance of an underlying investment.
The key ideas, at a glance
Investment thesis
Read the visual, then follow the worked example below. Use the stated case assumptions.
Illustrative worked case
million
- Already called
- 0.8 (40%)
- Unfunded
- 1.2 (60%)
The original 2m commitment less 0.8m called leaves 1.2m unfunded, assuming no commitment adjustments.
| Concept | Rule or decision | Common mistake |
|---|---|---|
| Investment thesis | Identify the expected source of value creation and challenge its assumptions. | A favorable market scenario is not evidence that the manager can execute it. |
| Manager and operations | Review the team, process, controls, conflicts and relevant track record. | Past gross returns are not equivalent to future investor net returns. |
| Cash and terms | Map capital calls, distributions, fees, liquidity terms and investor obligations. | An unfunded commitment remains a future cash obligation. |
| Exit and downside | Stress the exit route, valuation, leverage and refinancing assumptions. | An unrealized valuation is not a cash distribution. |
01Investment thesis
Identify the expected source of value creation and challenge its assumptions.
Watch for: A favorable market scenario is not evidence that the manager can execute it.
02Manager and operations
Review the team, process, controls, conflicts and relevant track record.
Watch for: Past gross returns are not equivalent to future investor net returns.
03Cash and terms
Map capital calls, distributions, fees, liquidity terms and investor obligations.
Watch for: An unfunded commitment remains a future cash obligation.
04Exit and downside
Stress the exit route, valuation, leverage and refinancing assumptions.
Watch for: An unrealized valuation is not a cash distribution.
Selected 2026 study concepts. Match your preparation to your registered exam-year curriculum. These notes are not complete curriculum coverage.
Free PDF by email
CFA Level III Private Markets: 20 practice MCQs
Enter your email on the PDF page to receive the printable pack, with answers and explanations. Selected level/pathway questions; see the topic mix before requesting.
No account or payment required for the PDFs. Includes the monthly newsletter; unsubscribe anytime.
Put the method to work
One worked example, from facts to answer
Given
An investor commits 2 million to a fund. Capital called so far is 0.8 million; assume no commitment adjustments.
Method
Unfunded commitment = 2 million - 0.8 million = 1.2 million.
Answer and interpretation
The investor must plan for the remaining 1.2 million commitment under the fund terms. The called amount alone understates the liquidity obligation.
Original independent teaching example. Assumptions are stated above; this is not an official exam question or scoring key.
Apply the framework, step by step
Evaluate a private investment or manager from thesis, operating evidence, fund terms and exit assumptions. This is a pathway application; the broader pathway comparison explains how the three options differ.
Before you start: Fund commitments versus invested capital, gross versus net returns, leverage and exit valuation assumptions.
METHOD 01
Investment thesis
Identify the expected source of value creation and challenge its assumptions.
Translate the investment thesis into observable operating assumptions. Revenue growth, margins, asset utilization or a strategic change can create value through different mechanisms. Ask what evidence supports execution and what would invalidate the plan. A favorable industry outlook does not establish that a particular manager or asset can deliver the projected result.
Avoid this mistake: A favorable market scenario is not evidence that the manager can execute it.
METHOD 02
Manager and operations
Review the team, process, controls, conflicts and relevant track record.
Assess the team, incentives, controls and relevant realized and unrealized record. Compare results on a consistent basis, including the effect of fees and leverage. Separate investment outcomes from marks that have not yet produced distributions. Operational weaknesses and conflicts can affect investor outcomes even when the underlying asset appears economically attractive.
Avoid this mistake: Past gross returns are not equivalent to future investor net returns.
METHOD 03
Cash and terms
Map capital calls, distributions, fees, liquidity terms and investor obligations.
Read the commitment, capital-call, fee, distribution and liquidity terms before deciding affordability. Unfunded commitments are future obligations under the fund terms, while returned capital or recallable distributions may affect the remaining obligation as specified. Do not treat a fund’s current net asset value as the full amount of cash the investor may need to supply.
Avoid this mistake: An unfunded commitment remains a future cash obligation.
METHOD 04
Exit and downside
Stress the exit route, valuation, leverage and refinancing assumptions.
Stress the investment’s exit route, valuation multiple, debt maturity and financing availability. An investment can meet its operating plan and still realize a disappointing return if the exit assumptions weaken. Consider whether the downside scenario creates a funding need or forces an unfavorable sale. Due diligence organizes questions and evidence; it does not guarantee an investment result.
Avoid this mistake: An unrealized valuation is not a cash distribution.
Apply it to a different case
- New facts
- An investment begins with enterprise value of 100 and net debt of 60. At exit, enterprise value is 110 and net debt is 40. Ignore fees, intermediate flows and other claims.
- Working
- Entry equity = 100 - 60 = 40. Exit equity = 110 - 40 = 70. Gross equity multiple = 70 / 40.
- Conclusion
- The gross equity multiple is 1.75×. Both enterprise-value growth and debt reduction contributed; this is not an investor net return or an IRR without timing.
Original teaching case under the stated assumptions, rather than an official exam question.
Questions about this method
- Is unfunded commitment the same as current net asset value?
- No. NAV is a valuation of the current fund interest. Unfunded commitment concerns capital the investor may still be obligated to supply under the terms. Liquidity planning needs both concepts and the applicable conditions.
- Can I compare a gross fund return with a net investor return?
- Not directly. Fees, carried interest, timing and other terms affect the investor’s cash flows. Compare like measures or reconcile the differences explicitly.
- Why does exit sensitivity belong in due diligence?
- Realized value depends on how and when the investment can be sold or refinanced, as well as operating performance. A weaker exit multiple or financing market can change the outcome even when operating targets are met.
Sources and curriculum scope
Official outlines establish curriculum scope. The explanations and worked examples are independent teaching material; the sources do not verify or endorse them.
- 2026 CFA Level 3 private markets outline
- Official Level 3 format and curriculum
- 2027 CFA Level 3 private markets outline
MiloPrep is an independent study resource, not affiliated with or endorsed by CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.