Skip to main content
CFA Level 3 · Free topic practice

CFA Level 3 Asset Allocation: notes and free practice

CFA Level 3 Asset Allocation sets a portfolio mix from objectives, constraints and capital-market expectations. Distinguish the long-term policy from tactical deviations and from trades that simply rebalance drift.

Level 3 · Visual study guideStudy illustration of an analyzed worksheet, calculator and checked answer.

Challenge the forecast

Read the visual, then follow the worked example below. Use the stated case assumptions.

Illustrative worked case

A revised forecast needs a reason

% estimated return

Previous estimate
6
Revised estimate
9

These are the case’s two estimates, not observed returns or a trend. Investigate valuation, earnings and regime assumptions behind the change.

  • 01Challenge the forecast

    Use consistent horizons, currencies and economic assumptions.

    Watch for: A precise forecast can still be biased or based on an unrepresentative sample.

  • 02Choose the risk lens

    Risk is relative to the goal, not just portfolio volatility.

    Watch for: Low asset volatility does not guarantee low funding risk.

  • 03Test the mix

    Expected return is a weighted sum; risk also depends on covariance.

    Watch for: Optimizer output is highly sensitive to estimated returns and correlations.

  • 04Write a rebalancing rule

    Restore the intended risk while respecting liquidity and costs.

    Watch for: Rebalancing restores risk; it does not guarantee higher returns.

Selected 2026 study concepts. Match your preparation to your registered exam-year curriculum. These notes are not complete curriculum coverage.

CFA Level I PDF coverCFA Level II PDF coverCFA Level III Portfolio Management PDF cover

Free PDF by email

All 5 CFA practice PDFs, in one email

Enter your email on the PDF page to receive all 5 printable packs, with answers and explanations. Selected level/pathway questions; see the topic mix before requesting.

No account or payment required for the PDFs. Includes the monthly newsletter; unsubscribe anytime.

Common core, for all three pathways. Selected 2026 concepts, not complete curriculum coverage. Choose pathway-specific practice or check 2027 changes.

Put the method to work

One worked example, from facts to answer

  1. Given

    Equity return estimates rise from 6% to 9% after one unusually strong year.

  2. Method

    Test valuation, earnings and regime assumptions rather than extrapolating the latest return.

  3. Answer and interpretation

    Keep scenario ranges and investigate why the long-run forecast changed.

Original independent teaching example. Assumptions are stated above; this is not an official exam question or scoring key.

Try it here - no account needed

10 free Asset Allocation questions

Five multiple-choice questions and five written prompts. Self-review written answers against teaching rubrics, not official scoring keys. Short independent cases, not a mock or pass prediction.

Saved in this tab when storage is available. Responses are not uploaded.

Completed

0 / 10

MCQ correct

0 / 0

Self-reviewed

0

Completion is not an exam score. Written responses are self-reviewed, not automatically graded.

  1. Question 1 of 10Level III common-core sampleAsset AllocationMultiple choice

    Case facts

    An allocation has 50% equities with expected return 8%, 30% bonds at 4%, and 20% cash at 2%.

    What is the portfolio’s expected return?

    Answer and explanations

    The weighted sum is 0.5 × 8% + 0.3 × 4% + 0.2 × 2% = 5.6%.

    Review the method
    • A - correct: The weighted sum is 0.5 × 8% + 0.3 × 4% + 0.2 × 2% = 5.6%.
    • B: An unweighted average would ignore the actual portfolio allocation.
    • C: 6.0% overstates the return of the specified weighted mix.
  2. Question 2 of 10Level III common-core sampleAsset AllocationMultiple choice

    Case facts

    A pension plan has asset value 126 million and liability present value 120 million, measured on the same date.

    What is the plan’s current funded ratio?

    Answer and explanations

    The funded ratio is assets divided by liabilities: 126/120 = 105.0%.

    Review the method
    • A: 95.2% reverses the asset-to-liability ratio.
    • B - correct: The funded ratio is assets divided by liabilities: 126/120 = 105.0%.
    • C: Six million is the surplus amount, not the funded ratio percentage.
  3. Question 3 of 10Level III common-core sampleAsset AllocationMultiple choice

    Case facts

    A portfolio begins with 60 in equities and 40 in bonds. Equities gain 25%; bonds are unchanged. Target equity weight remains 60%. Ignore costs.

    How much equity must be sold to return to the target weight?

    Answer and explanations

    Equities become 75 and total assets 115; target equities are 69, so sell 6 units.

    Review the method
    • A: Selling the whole equity gain would restore the old amounts, not target weights on the new total.
    • B: Three units would leave equities above the 60% target.
    • C - correct: Equities become 75 and total assets 115; target equities are 69, so sell 6 units.
  4. Question 4 of 10Level III common-core sampleAsset AllocationMultiple choice

    Case facts

    A strategist calibrates long-run returns solely from a decade of falling yields and unusually strong bond price gains.

    Which concern most directly challenges this forecast?

    Answer and explanations

    A period of falling yields may not represent the future regime, making simple extrapolation unreliable.

    Review the method
    • A - correct: A period of falling yields may not represent the future regime, making simple extrapolation unreliable.
    • B: A long sample can still reflect an unrepresentative economic regime.
    • C: Forecasts remain possible, but they require assumptions beyond blindly extrapolating returns.
  5. Question 5 of 10Level III common-core sampleAsset AllocationMultiple choice

    Case facts

    For a two-asset portfolio, weights are 50/50, both volatilities are 10%, and correlation is zero.

    What is the portfolio volatility, rounded to two decimals?

    Answer and explanations

    Variance is 0.5² × 0.1² + 0.5² × 0.1² = 0.005; its square root is 7.07%.

    Review the method
    • A: A simple weighted average ignores the diversification effect of zero correlation.
    • B - correct: Variance is 0.5² × 0.1² + 0.5² × 0.1² = 0.005; its square root is 7.07%.
    • C: 5.00% is below the square root of the correctly combined variances.
  6. Question 6 of 10Level III common-core sampleAsset AllocationWritten response

    Case facts

    A foundation must pay a fixed, domestic-currency grant in nine months. Its remaining assets fund a long-horizon mission.

    Recommend an allocation approach for the grant and justify it.

    Model answer and self-review rubric

    Separate the known grant from long-horizon assets and fund it with liquid, low-risk assets matched to the payment date and currency. The near-term liability should not depend on selling risky assets in a downturn.

    Review the method

    Teaching checklist only. No official points or automated grade.

  7. Question 7 of 10Level III common-core sampleAsset AllocationWritten response

    Case facts

    A mean-variance optimizer puts 95% into one asset after its estimated return rises by 0.2 percentage points.

    Recommend two checks before adopting this allocation.

    Model answer and self-review rubric

    Run sensitivity and scenario tests on expected returns, correlations and risk estimates. Add economically justified concentration and liquidity constraints, then assess whether the result meets client goals under less favorable assumptions.

    Review the method

    Teaching checklist only. No official points or automated grade.

  8. Question 8 of 10Level III common-core sampleAsset AllocationWritten response

    Case facts

    A client’s main business and most financial assets are exposed to the same domestic cyclical industry.

    Explain why the economic balance sheet may favor diversifying financial assets.

    Model answer and self-review rubric

    Business wealth and future labor income can fall alongside the industry holdings. Considering these nonportfolio exposures reveals concentration that the financial portfolio alone understates; diversified financial assets may reduce total economic risk.

    Review the method

    Teaching checklist only. No official points or automated grade.

  9. Question 9 of 10Level III common-core sampleAsset AllocationWritten response

    Case facts

    A taxable portfolio exceeds its equity band, but selling immediately creates large capital gains. A cash contribution arrives next week.

    Recommend an implementation choice and one limitation.

    Model answer and self-review rubric

    Consider directing the imminent cash contribution to underweight assets, reducing taxable sales. Check whether the contribution is sufficient and whether waiting leaves unacceptable risk outside the policy band.

    Review the method

    Teaching checklist only. No official points or automated grade.

  10. Question 10 of 10Level III common-core sampleAsset AllocationWritten response

    Case facts

    A client requests a 7% expected return using 40% equities expected to earn 8% and 60% bonds expected to earn 3%.

    Calculate the mix’s expected return and explain the implication for the objective.

    Model answer and self-review rubric

    Expected return is 0.40 × 8% + 0.60 × 3% = 5.0%. This is below the 7% objective; revisit spending, contributions, horizon or risk capacity rather than treating the requested return as a guaranteed forecast.

    Review the method

    Teaching checklist only. No official points or automated grade.

Four ideas to put to work

Find the method you need

Start with: Expected returns, covariance, asset weights and investor constraints.

METHOD 01

Challenge the forecast

Use consistent horizons, currencies and economic assumptions.

  • Separate a long-run expectation from a short-term scenario.
  • Check whether historical data represent the current regime.
  • Stress the inputs that drive the allocation most.

Worked example

Given
Equity return estimates rise from 6% to 9% after one unusually strong year.
Calculate / decide
Test valuation, earnings and regime assumptions rather than extrapolating the latest return.
Result
Keep scenario ranges and investigate why the long-run forecast changed.

Watch for: A precise forecast can still be biased or based on an unrepresentative sample.

Practise this idea

METHOD 02

Choose the risk lens

Risk is relative to the goal, not just portfolio volatility.

  • Name the liability or goal and its horizon.
  • Identify cash-flow dates, currency and inflation exposure.
  • Choose an asset-only, liability-relative or goals-based lens.

Worked example

Given
Assets are 110 and liability present value is 100.
Calculate / decide
Funded ratio = 110/100; surplus = 110 - 100.
Result
110% funded, with a surplus of 10; still test how both sides change.

Watch for: Low asset volatility does not guarantee low funding risk.

Practise this idea

METHOD 03

Test the mix

Expected return is a weighted sum; risk also depends on covariance.

  • Confirm that weights sum to one.
  • Calculate expected return using consistent units.
  • Stress correlations and impose realistic allocation constraints.

Worked example

Given
60% equities at 7%; 40% bonds at 3%.
Calculate / decide
0.60 × 7% + 0.40 × 3%.
Result
5.4% expected return, not a promised outcome.

Watch for: Optimizer output is highly sensitive to estimated returns and correlations.

Practise this idea

METHOD 04

Write a rebalancing rule

Restore the intended risk while respecting liquidity and costs.

  • Compare current weights with policy bands.
  • Use cash flows before unnecessary sales where practical.
  • Evaluate taxes, costs and changes in client circumstances.

Worked example

Given
A 60/40 portfolio grows to 72 of equities and 40 of bonds.
Calculate / decide
Total = 112; policy equity amount = 0.60 × 112 = 67.2.
Result
Sell 4.8 of equities and buy bonds, ignoring costs and taxes.

Watch for: Rebalancing restores risk; it does not guarantee higher returns.

Practise this idea

Questions about this topic

How does a liability-relative objective differ from an asset-only objective?
A liability-relative framework evaluates assets in relation to obligations and shortfall or surplus outcomes. An asset-only framework evaluates the asset portfolio’s risk and return without making the same liability-relative objective the central measure.
Is rebalancing the same as a tactical allocation?
No. Rebalancing restores an existing policy after drift. Tactical allocation deliberately deviates from policy to express a shorter-term view within the applicable risk and governance framework.
Do exam weights prescribe study-hour allocations?
No. They describe published exam emphasis. Your preparation also depends on baseline knowledge, remaining weaknesses, question formats and available time.

Apply the topic to a focused case

CFA Level 3 strategic vs tactical asset allocation

Strategic allocation establishes the long-term policy from objectives, constraints and capital-market assumptions. A change in a client’s liabilities or risk capacity can justify revisiting it. A recent return alone is not a complete reason to change policy. State what objective or assumption changed and how the proposed weights address it.

Case facts
A portfolio has 12 million of total assets, an unchanged 50% equity target and a current equity value of 6.6 million. Ignore costs and changes in total assets.
Apply the method
Target equity = 12 × 0.50 = 6 million. Current weight = 6.6 / 12 = 55%. Sell 0.6 million to return to the policy target.
Interpretation
Restoring 50% is rebalancing. Keeping 55% intentionally under a documented shorter-term view is a tactical overweight; changing the long-term target is a policy decision.

Independent teaching cases under the stated assumptions, rather than official questions or scoring keys.

Sources and curriculum scope

Official outlines establish curriculum scope. The explanations and worked examples are independent teaching material; the sources do not verify or endorse them.

Compare exam-year outlines and topic weights

MiloPrep is an independent study resource, not affiliated with or endorsed by CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.